Macao vs Qatar: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Macao
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Macao, a difference of 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Macao ahead.
Macao ranks 35th and Qatar ranks 34th of 204 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2328 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Macao |
| 2000s | 0.8998 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Macao |
| 2010s | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Macao |
| 2020s | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0035 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Macao or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Macao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Macao and Qatar?
- 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Qatar?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Macao and Qatar rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Macao ranks 35th and Qatar ranks 34th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.