Kosovo vs Tonga: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Kosovo
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports -0.0373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kosovo, a difference of 0.024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 105th and Tonga ranks 104th of 204 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kosovo averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.4111 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
| 2010s | -0.4359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3276 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tonga |
| 2020s | -0.1211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0644 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Kosovo or Tonga?
- Tonga, at -0.0373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kosovo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Kosovo and Tonga?
- 0.024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Tonga?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Kosovo and Tonga rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Kosovo ranks 105th and Tonga ranks 104th of 204 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.