Kosovo vs Tonga: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Kosovo
-0.0613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Tonga
-0.059 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Kosovo rank
113th
Tonga rank
112th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Kosovo
  • Tonga
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-00.2200420142025

How they compare

Tonga currently reports -0.059 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kosovo, a difference of 0.0023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.

Kosovo ranks 113th and Tonga ranks 112th of 206 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kosovo averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kosovo Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s -0.4111 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.466 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0549 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kosovo
2010s -0.4359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tonga
2020s -0.1211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Kosovo or Tonga?
Tonga, at -0.059 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kosovo as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Kosovo and Tonga?
0.0023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Tonga?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Kosovo and Tonga rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Kosovo ranks 113th and Tonga ranks 112th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kosovo vs Tonga: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kosovo/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kosovo/tonga/">Kosovo vs Tonga: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.