Kosovo vs North Macedonia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Kosovo
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports -0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kosovo, a difference of 0.029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 19 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Kosovo ranks 105th and North Macedonia ranks 103rd of 204 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.4111 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3003 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | -0.4359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1294 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3065 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | -0.1211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.034 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0871 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Kosovo or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at -0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kosovo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Kosovo and North Macedonia?
- 0.029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and North Macedonia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Kosovo and North Macedonia rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Kosovo ranks 105th and North Macedonia ranks 103rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.