Kiribati vs Paraguay: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Kiribati
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports -0.3545 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0798 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 137th and Paraguay ranks 134th of 204 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9146 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4386 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | -0.5006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6856 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.185 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | -0.322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1525 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Kiribati or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at -0.3545 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Kiribati and Paraguay?
- 0.0798 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Paraguay?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Paraguay rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Kiribati ranks 137th and Paraguay ranks 134th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.