Jordan vs Palau: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Jordan
- Palau
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.1113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Palau, a difference of 0.0077 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Palau's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 99th and Palau ranks 100th of 206 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1363 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5534 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.1636 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2636 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4272 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0.0548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0306 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0854 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Jordan or Palau?
- Jordan, at 0.1113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Palau as of 2025.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Jordan and Palau?
- 0.0077 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Palau?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Palau rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Jordan ranks 99th and Palau ranks 100th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.