Israel vs Macao: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Israel
- Macao
How they compare
Israel currently reports 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Macao, a difference of 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 31st and Macao ranks 33rd of 206 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
| 2000s | 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8763 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5154 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
| 2010s | 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4283 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
| 2020s | 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Israel or Macao?
- Israel, at 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Macao as of 2025.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Israel and Macao?
- 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Macao?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Macao rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Israel ranks 31st and Macao ranks 33rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.