Guam vs Israel: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Guam
- Israel
How they compare
Guam currently reports 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Israel, a difference of 0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Israel ahead.
Guam ranks 29th and Israel ranks 31st of 206 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.2271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
| 2010s | 0.3309 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
| 2020s | 0.9831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3149 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Guam or Israel?
- Guam, at 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Guam and Israel?
- 0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Israel?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Guam and Israel rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Guam ranks 29th and Israel ranks 31st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.