Ghana vs Nauru: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Ghana
- Nauru
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 0.0596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nauru, a difference of 0.0496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Ghana's figure about 5.9 times Nauru's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 98th and Nauru ranks 101st of 204 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0679 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4379 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ghana |
| 2010s | -0.0212 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1175 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0964 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ghana |
| 2020s | -0.0159 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0328 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0169 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Ghana or Nauru?
- Ghana, at 0.0596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nauru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Ghana and Nauru?
- 0.0496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Nauru?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Ghana and Nauru rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Ghana ranks 98th and Nauru ranks 101st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.