France vs Guam: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- France
- Guam
How they compare
Guam currently reports 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in France, a difference of 0.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Guam's figure about 1.1 times France's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was France ahead.
France ranks 28th and Guam ranks 25th of 204 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Guam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2007 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | France |
| 2010s | 1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3483 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | France |
| 2020s | 1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4668 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, France or Guam?
- Guam, at 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in France as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between France and Guam?
- 0.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Guam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do France and Guam rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- France ranks 28th and Guam ranks 25th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.