Eswatini vs Mauritania: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate

Eswatini
-0.7811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mauritania
-0.7412 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Eswatini rank
161st
Mauritania rank
159th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time

  • Eswatini
  • Mauritania
-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2199620102024

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports -0.7412 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0399 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritania ahead.

Eswatini ranks 161st and Mauritania ranks 159th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s -0.278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
2000s -0.6051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6027 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2010s -0.3052 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7653 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4602 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini
2020s -0.6956 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8372 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1416 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Eswatini or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at -0.7412 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Eswatini and Mauritania?
0.0399 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mauritania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Mauritania rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Eswatini ranks 161st and Mauritania ranks 159th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Mauritania: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/eswatini/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/eswatini/mauritania/">Eswatini vs Mauritania: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,142 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.