Egypt vs Kosovo: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Egypt
- Kosovo
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports -0.0613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0971 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Egypt, a difference of 0.0358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Egypt ranks 108th and Kosovo ranks 105th of 204 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.5112 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4111 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1002 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
| 2010s | -0.4811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
| 2020s | -0.1479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Egypt or Kosovo?
- Kosovo, at -0.0613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0971 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Egypt and Kosovo?
- 0.0358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Kosovo?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Kosovo rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Egypt ranks 108th and Kosovo ranks 105th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.