Djibouti vs Kiribati: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Djibouti
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports -0.4343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Djibouti, a difference of 0.0587 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 139th and Kiribati ranks 137th of 204 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.361 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | -0.7305 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2299 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | -0.582 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Djibouti or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at -0.4343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Djibouti as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Djibouti and Kiribati?
- 0.0587 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Kiribati?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Djibouti and Kiribati rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Djibouti ranks 139th and Kiribati ranks 137th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.