Costa Rica vs Republic of Moldova: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate

Costa Rica
0.2869 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Republic of Moldova
0.2576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
77th
Republic of Moldova rank
80th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Republic of Moldova
-1-0.500.5199620102024

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.2869 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.0293 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Republic of Moldova's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 77th and Republic of Moldova ranks 80th of 204 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s -0.0254 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Costa Rica
2000s 0.2323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7697 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Costa Rica
2010s 0.3572 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4833 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Costa Rica
2020s 0.2479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0784 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Costa Rica or Republic of Moldova?
Costa Rica, at 0.2869 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Costa Rica and Republic of Moldova?
0.0293 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Republic of Moldova?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and Republic of Moldova rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Costa Rica ranks 77th and Republic of Moldova ranks 80th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Republic of Moldova: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/costa-rica/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/costa-rica/moldova/">Costa Rica vs Republic of Moldova: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,142 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.