Congo vs Palestine: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Congo
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Congo, a difference of 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Palestine ahead.
Congo ranks 184th and Palestine ranks 181st of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0003 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Congo |
| 2000s | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.919 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3283 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Palestine |
| 2010s | -0.9743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3411 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6331 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Palestine |
| 2020s | -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3674 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Congo or Palestine?
- Palestine, at -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Congo and Palestine?
- 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Palestine?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Palestine rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Congo ranks 184th and Palestine ranks 181st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.