Chile vs Malaysia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Chile
1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Malaysia
0.9567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Chile rank
38th
Malaysia rank
41st

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Chile
  • Malaysia
00.511.5199620102025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0833 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 38th and Malaysia ranks 41st of 206 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6814 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2871 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2000s 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7589 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2010s 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8849 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2020s 0.9726 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.869 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Chile or Malaysia?
Chile, at 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malaysia as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Chile and Malaysia?
0.0833 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malaysia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Chile and Malaysia rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Chile ranks 38th and Malaysia ranks 41st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Malaysia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/chile/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/chile/malaysia/">Chile vs Malaysia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.