Chile vs Macao: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Chile
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chile, a difference of 0.1555 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Macao's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 38th and Macao ranks 35th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Macao in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9488 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7105 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Chile |
| 2000s | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8998 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.288 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Chile |
| 2010s | 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.9159 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2001 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Chile or Macao?
- Macao, at 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Chile and Macao?
- 0.1555 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Macao?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Macao rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Chile ranks 38th and Macao ranks 35th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.