Cambodia vs Kiribati: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Cambodia
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports -0.3649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.0357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kiribati ahead.
Cambodia ranks 139th and Kiribati ranks 136th of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5092 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | -0.4357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5203 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0846 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cambodia |
| 2020s | -0.4831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3601 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Cambodia or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at -0.3649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cambodia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Cambodia and Kiribati?
- 0.0357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Kiribati?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Kiribati rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Cambodia ranks 139th and Kiribati ranks 136th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.