Brunei Darussalam vs San Marino: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate

Brunei Darussalam
0.8352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
San Marino
0.8976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Brunei Darussalam rank
44th
San Marino rank
41st

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time

  • Brunei Darussalam
  • San Marino
0.50.7511.21.5199620102024

How they compare

San Marino currently reports 0.8976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.0624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes San Marino's figure about 1.1 times Brunei Darussalam's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was San Marino ahead.

Brunei Darussalam ranks 44th and San Marino ranks 41st of 204 countries.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brunei Darussalam San Marino Difference Ahead
2010s 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 San Marino
2020s 0.9914 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1816 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 San Marino

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Brunei Darussalam or San Marino?
San Marino, at 0.8976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brunei Darussalam as of 2024.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Brunei Darussalam and San Marino?
0.0624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with San Marino ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and San Marino?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Brunei Darussalam and San Marino rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Brunei Darussalam ranks 44th and San Marino ranks 41st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brunei Darussalam vs San Marino: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brunei-darussalam/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brunei-darussalam/san-marino/">Brunei Darussalam vs San Marino: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,142 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.