Barbados vs China: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Barbados
0.611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
China
0.6238 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Barbados rank
60th
China rank
59th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Barbados
  • China
-0.500.511.5199620102025

How they compare

China currently reports 0.6238 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Barbados, a difference of 0.0128 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 60th and China ranks 59th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados China Difference Ahead
1990s 0.718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Barbados
2000s 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3857 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Barbados
2010s 0.9995 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2508 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Barbados
2020s 0.5543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5878 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0335 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Barbados or China?
China, at 0.6238 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Barbados as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Barbados and China?
0.0128 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Barbados and China rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Barbados ranks 60th and China ranks 59th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/barbados/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/barbados/china/">Barbados vs China: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.