Bangladesh vs Cambodia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Bangladesh
-0.4447 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Cambodia
-0.4006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
142nd
Cambodia rank
139th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Cambodia
-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199620102025

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports -0.4006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4447 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.0441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 142nd and Cambodia ranks 139th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Cambodia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Cambodia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.7683 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4859 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bangladesh
2000s -0.8498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2477 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bangladesh
2010s -0.5699 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cambodia
2020s -0.488 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Bangladesh or Cambodia?
Cambodia, at -0.4006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4447 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bangladesh as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Bangladesh and Cambodia?
0.0441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cambodia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Cambodia rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Bangladesh ranks 142nd and Cambodia ranks 139th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Cambodia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bangladesh/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bangladesh/cambodia/">Bangladesh vs Cambodia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.