Aruba vs Poland: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Aruba
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.6734 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6568 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Aruba, a difference of 0.0166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 56th and Poland ranks 54th of 204 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8564 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.8605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1716 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.8268 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6177 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2092 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Aruba or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.6734 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6568 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Aruba and Poland?
- 0.0166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Poland?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Poland rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Aruba ranks 56th and Poland ranks 54th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.