Aruba vs Malta: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Aruba
- Malta
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.6568 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malta, a difference of 0.0343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 56th and Malta ranks 58th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9312 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.285 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.8605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1834 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malta |
| 2020s | 0.8268 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8794 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0526 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Aruba or Malta?
- Aruba, at 0.6568 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Aruba and Malta?
- 0.0343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Malta?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Malta rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Aruba ranks 56th and Malta ranks 58th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.