Aruba vs Italy: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Aruba
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 0.9246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9048 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Aruba, a difference of 0.0198 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 43rd and Italy ranks 42nd of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Italy in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3428 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.7444 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4828 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2617 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.757 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Aruba or Italy?
- Italy, at 0.9246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9048 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Aruba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Aruba and Italy?
- 0.0198 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Italy?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Italy rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Aruba ranks 43rd and Italy ranks 42nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.