Angola vs Vanuatu: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Angola
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Angola currently reports -0.7852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8169 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.0317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Vanuatu ahead.
Angola ranks 162nd and Vanuatu ranks 165th of 204 countries.
Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0329 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | -0.9695 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6256 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Vanuatu |
| 2020s | -0.8795 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.075 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Angola or Vanuatu?
- Angola, at -0.7852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8169 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Vanuatu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Angola and Vanuatu?
- 0.0317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Vanuatu?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Vanuatu rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Angola ranks 162nd and Vanuatu ranks 165th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.