Angola vs Mauritania: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Angola
-0.7086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Mauritania
-0.7567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Angola rank
158th
Mauritania rank
161st

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Angola
  • Mauritania
-1.5-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199620102025

How they compare

Angola currently reports -0.7086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritania ahead.

Angola ranks 158th and Mauritania ranks 161st of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2000s -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5625 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2010s -0.9342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2020s -0.8179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0301 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Angola or Mauritania?
Angola, at -0.7086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritania as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Angola and Mauritania?
0.0481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Mauritania?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Angola and Mauritania rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Angola ranks 158th and Mauritania ranks 161st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Mauritania: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/angola/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/angola/mauritania/">Angola vs Mauritania: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.