Antigua and Barbuda vs Congo: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - F-gases

Antigua and Barbuda
7.87
in 2015
Congo
6.55
in 2015
Antigua and Barbuda rank
87th
Congo rank
89th

GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - F-gases over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Congo
02468199020022015

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 7.87 against 6.55 in Congo, a difference of 1.32.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 87th and Congo ranks 89th of 93 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7035 0.2077 0.4957 Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 5.69 4.29 1.39 Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 7.85 6.54 1.31 Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - f-gases, Antigua and Barbuda or Congo?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 7.87 against 6.55 in Congo as of 2015.
What is the difference in ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - f-gases between Antigua and Barbuda and Congo?
1.32, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Congo?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Congo rank globally for ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - f-gases?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 87th and Congo ranks 89th of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - F-gases. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Congo: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - F-gases. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/ghg-emissions-from-food-systems-by-gas-mt-co2-eq-f-gases/antigua-and-barbuda/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/ghg-emissions-from-food-systems-by-gas-mt-co2-eq-f-gases/antigua-and-barbuda/congo-rep/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Congo: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - F-gases</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - F-gases
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
93 places, 2,418 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

GHG emissions from food systems disaggregated by gas are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).