Barbados vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2

Barbados
272.14
in 2015
Eswatini, Kingdom of
223.02
in 2015
Barbados rank
158th
Eswatini, Kingdom of rank
161st

GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2 over time

  • Barbados
  • Eswatini, Kingdom of
0100200300400500199020022015

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 272.14 against 223.02 in Eswatini, Kingdom of, a difference of 49.12.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini, Kingdom of's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini, Kingdom of ahead.

Barbados ranks 158th and Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 161st of 202 countries.

Eswatini, Kingdom of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Eswatini, Kingdom of Difference Ahead
1990s 54.03 282.34 228.31 Eswatini, Kingdom of
2000s 165.17 291.24 126.06 Eswatini, Kingdom of
2010s 232.59 244.34 11.75 Eswatini, Kingdom of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - co2, Barbados or Eswatini, Kingdom of?
Barbados, at 272.14 against 223.02 in Eswatini, Kingdom of as of 2015.
What is the difference in ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - co2 between Barbados and Eswatini, Kingdom of?
49.12, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Eswatini, Kingdom of?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Barbados and Eswatini, Kingdom of rank globally for ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - co2?
Barbados ranks 158th and Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 161st of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/ghg-emissions-from-food-systems-by-gas-mt-co2-eq-co2/barbados/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/ghg-emissions-from-food-systems-by-gas-mt-co2-eq-co2/barbados/eswatini/">Barbados vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,304 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

GHG emissions from food systems disaggregated by gas are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).