Dominican Republic vs Rwanda: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail

Dominican Republic
0.9422
in 2015
Rwanda
0.7651
in 2015
Dominican Republic rank
108th
Rwanda rank
110th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Rwanda
00.250.50.751199020022015

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 0.9422 against 0.7651 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.1771.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 108th and Rwanda ranks 110th of 193 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5989 0.0163 0.5826 Dominican Republic
2000s 0.7709 0.5891 0.1818 Dominican Republic
2010s 0.7487 0.8883 0.1396 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - retail, Dominican Republic or Rwanda?
Dominican Republic, at 0.9422 against 0.7651 in Rwanda as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - retail between Dominican Republic and Rwanda?
0.1771, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Rwanda?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Dominican Republic and Rwanda rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - retail?
Dominican Republic ranks 108th and Rwanda ranks 110th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Rwanda: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-retail/dominican-republic/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-retail/dominican-republic/rwanda/">Dominican Republic vs Rwanda: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
193 places, 5,004 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).