American Samoa vs Costa Rica: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Production

American Samoa
18.4
in 2015
Costa Rica
19.99
in 2015
American Samoa rank
167th
Costa Rica rank
164th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Production over time

  • American Samoa
  • Costa Rica
2030405060199020022015

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 19.99 against 18.4 in American Samoa, a difference of 1.59.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times American Samoa's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

American Samoa ranks 167th and Costa Rica ranks 164th of 201 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade American Samoa Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1990s 18.69 38.28 19.59 Costa Rica
2000s 17.97 54.75 36.78 Costa Rica
2010s 18.39 26.34 7.95 Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - production, American Samoa or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 19.99 against 18.4 in American Samoa as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - production between American Samoa and Costa Rica?
1.59, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Costa Rica?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do American Samoa and Costa Rica rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - production?
American Samoa ranks 167th and Costa Rica ranks 164th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

American Samoa vs Costa Rica: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Production. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-production/american-samoa/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-production/american-samoa/costa-rica/">American Samoa vs Costa Rica: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
201 places, 5,226 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).