Kiribati vs Macau (China): Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing
Kiribati
2.2
in 2015
Macau (China)
2.14
in 2015
Kiribati rank
100th
Macau (China) rank
101st
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing over time
- Kiribati
- Macau (China)
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 2.2 against 2.14 in Macau (China), a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Macau (China) ahead.
Kiribati ranks 100th and Macau (China) ranks 101st of 199 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Macau (China) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Macau (China) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.9 | 3.25 | 1.35 | Macau (China) |
| 2000s | 2.55 | 4.48 | 1.93 | Macau (China) |
| 2010s | 2.2 | 2.1 | 0.1012 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing, Kiribati or Macau (China)?
- Kiribati, at 2.2 against 2.14 in Macau (China) as of 2015.
- What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing between Kiribati and Macau (China)?
- 0.06, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Macau (China)?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Kiribati and Macau (China) rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing?
- Kiribati ranks 100th and Macau (China) ranks 101st of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.