Canada vs Kiribati: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing
Canada
2.11
in 2015
Kiribati
2.2
in 2015
Canada rank
103rd
Kiribati rank
100th
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing over time
- Canada
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 2.2 against 2.11 in Canada, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kiribati ahead.
Canada ranks 103rd and Kiribati ranks 100th of 199 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9687 | 1.9 | 0.9306 | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 1.95 | 2.55 | 0.5995 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 2.33 | 2.2 | 0.1304 | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing, Canada or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 2.2 against 2.11 in Canada as of 2015.
- What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing between Canada and Kiribati?
- 0.09, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Kiribati?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Canada and Kiribati rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing?
- Canada ranks 103rd and Kiribati ranks 100th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.