Gambia vs Marshall Islands: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging

Gambia
0.0678
in 2015
Marshall Islands
0.0542
in 2015
Gambia rank
162nd
Marshall Islands rank
165th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging over time

  • Gambia
  • Marshall Islands
0.020.040.060.08199020022015

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.0678 against 0.0542 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.0136.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.3 times Marshall Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Marshall Islands ahead.

Gambia ranks 162nd and Marshall Islands ranks 165th of 203 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Marshall Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0148 0.0551 0.0403 Marshall Islands
2000s 0.0545 0.0547 0.0002 Marshall Islands
2010s 0.0661 0.0543 0.0117 Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging, Gambia or Marshall Islands?
Gambia, at 0.0678 against 0.0542 in Marshall Islands as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging between Gambia and Marshall Islands?
0.0136, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Marshall Islands?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Gambia and Marshall Islands rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging?
Gambia ranks 162nd and Marshall Islands ranks 165th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Marshall Islands: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-packaging/gambia-the/marshall-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-packaging/gambia-the/marshall-islands/">Gambia vs Marshall Islands: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 5,278 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).