Congo vs Kiribati: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging

Congo
0.3405
in 2015
Kiribati
0.3854
in 2015
Congo rank
138th
Kiribati rank
135th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging over time

  • Congo
  • Kiribati
0.20.40.60.81199020022015

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.3854 against 0.3405 in Congo, a difference of 0.0449.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kiribati ahead.

Congo ranks 138th and Kiribati ranks 135th of 201 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Kiribati Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5682 0.3895 0.1787 Congo
2000s 0.5373 0.5977 0.0604 Kiribati
2010s 0.3856 0.5482 0.1626 Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging, Congo or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 0.3854 against 0.3405 in Congo as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging between Congo and Kiribati?
0.0449, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kiribati?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Congo and Kiribati rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging?
Congo ranks 138th and Kiribati ranks 135th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Kiribati: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-packaging/congo-rep/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-packaging/congo-rep/kiribati/">Congo vs Kiribati: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 5,278 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).