Central African Republic vs Guam: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging

Central African Republic
0.0051
in 2015
Guam
0.0072
in 2015
Central African Republic rank
193rd
Guam rank
191st

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Guam
0.0020.0040.0060.008199020022015

How they compare

Guam currently reports 0.0072 against 0.0051 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0021.

That makes Guam's figure about 1.4 times Central African Republic's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guam has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 193rd and Guam ranks 191st of 203 countries.

Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Guam Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0014 0.0073 0.0059 Guam
2000s 0.0042 0.0071 0.0029 Guam
2010s 0.0046 0.0071 0.0025 Guam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging, Central African Republic or Guam?
Guam, at 0.0072 against 0.0051 in Central African Republic as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging between Central African Republic and Guam?
0.0021, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Guam?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Central African Republic and Guam rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging?
Central African Republic ranks 193rd and Guam ranks 191st of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Guam: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-packaging/central-african-republic/guam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-packaging/central-african-republic/guam/">Central African Republic vs Guam: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 5,278 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).