Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands vs Libya: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging

Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands
3.65
in 2015
Libya
3.94
in 2015
Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands rank
72nd
Libya rank
69th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging over time

  • Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands
  • Libya
2468199020022015

How they compare

Libya currently reports 3.94 against 3.65 in Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands, a difference of 0.29.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.

Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands ranks 72nd and Libya ranks 69th of 201 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands Libya Difference Ahead
1990s 3.73 7.24 3.51 Libya
2000s 2.85 5.99 3.14 Libya
2010s 3.42 4.46 1.03 Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging, Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands or Libya?
Libya, at 3.94 against 3.65 in Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging between Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands and Libya?
0.29, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands and Libya?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands and Libya rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging?
Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands ranks 72nd and Libya ranks 69th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands vs Libya: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-packaging/aruba/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-packaging/aruba/libya/">Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands vs Libya: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 5,278 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).