Poland vs Sri Lanka: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC

Poland
12.97 Production
in 2015
Sri Lanka
12.81 Production
in 2015
Poland rank
82nd
Sri Lanka rank
83rd

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC over time

  • Poland
  • Sri Lanka
05101520199020022015

How they compare

Poland currently reports 12.97 Production against 12.81 Production in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.16 Production.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Poland ranks 82nd and Sri Lanka ranks 83rd of 179 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 11.72 Production 15.77 Production 4.05 Production Sri Lanka
2000s 12.67 Production 16.87 Production 4.21 Production Sri Lanka
2010s 12.75 Production 12.89 Production 0.1323 Production Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc, Poland or Sri Lanka?
Poland, at 12.97 Production against 12.81 Production in Sri Lanka as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc between Poland and Sri Lanka?
0.16 Production, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Sri Lanka?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Poland and Sri Lanka rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc?
Poland ranks 82nd and Sri Lanka ranks 83rd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Sri Lanka: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/poland/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/poland/sri-lanka/">Poland vs Sri Lanka: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production)
Unit
Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,654 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).