Lesotho vs Puerto Rico: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC

Lesotho
3.67 Production
in 2015
Puerto Rico
3.93 Production
in 2015
Lesotho rank
115th
Puerto Rico rank
112th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC over time

  • Lesotho
  • Puerto Rico
0246199020022015

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 3.93 Production against 3.67 Production in Lesotho, a difference of 0.26 Production.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

Lesotho ranks 115th and Puerto Rico ranks 112th of 179 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1990s 0.8506 Production 5.85 Production 5 Production Puerto Rico
2000s 0.2235 Production 4.19 Production 3.97 Production Puerto Rico
2010s 2.96 Production 4.15 Production 1.19 Production Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc, Lesotho or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 3.93 Production against 3.67 Production in Lesotho as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc between Lesotho and Puerto Rico?
0.26 Production, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Puerto Rico?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Lesotho and Puerto Rico rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc?
Lesotho ranks 115th and Puerto Rico ranks 112th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Puerto Rico: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/lesotho/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/lesotho/puerto-rico-us/">Lesotho vs Puerto Rico: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production)
Unit
Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,654 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).