Bangladesh vs Mali: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC

Bangladesh
14.47 Production
in 2015
Mali
18.1 Production
in 2015
Bangladesh rank
80th
Mali rank
77th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Mali
10203040199020022015

How they compare

Mali currently reports 18.1 Production against 14.47 Production in Bangladesh, a difference of 3.63 Production.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.3 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 80th and Mali ranks 77th of 179 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Mali Difference Ahead
1990s 17.09 Production 37.68 Production 20.6 Production Mali
2000s 15.59 Production 34.44 Production 18.85 Production Mali
2010s 14.87 Production 21.39 Production 6.51 Production Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc, Bangladesh or Mali?
Mali, at 18.1 Production against 14.47 Production in Bangladesh as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc between Bangladesh and Mali?
3.63 Production, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Mali?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Bangladesh and Mali rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc?
Bangladesh ranks 80th and Mali ranks 77th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Mali: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/bangladesh/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/bangladesh/mali/">Bangladesh vs Mali: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production)
Unit
Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,654 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).