Argentina vs Belarus: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC

Argentina
39.55 Production
in 2015
Belarus
41.79 Production
in 2015
Argentina rank
56th
Belarus rank
54th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC over time

  • Argentina
  • Belarus
0204060199020022015

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 41.79 Production against 39.55 Production in Argentina, a difference of 2.24 Production.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 56th and Belarus ranks 54th of 179 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Belarus in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 45.3 Production 39.8 Production 5.5 Production Argentina
2000s 44.75 Production 45.04 Production 0.2939 Production Belarus
2010s 41.43 Production 40.43 Production 1.01 Production Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc, Argentina or Belarus?
Belarus, at 41.79 Production against 39.55 Production in Argentina as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc between Argentina and Belarus?
2.24 Production, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Belarus?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Argentina and Belarus rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc?
Argentina ranks 56th and Belarus ranks 54th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Belarus: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/argentina/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/argentina/belarus/">Argentina vs Belarus: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production)
Unit
Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,654 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).