American Samoa vs Canada: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC

American Samoa
50.47 Production
in 2015
Canada
54.82 Production
in 2015
American Samoa rank
40th
Canada rank
37th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC over time

  • American Samoa
  • Canada
0204060199020022015

How they compare

Canada currently reports 54.82 Production against 50.47 Production in American Samoa, a difference of 4.35 Production.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times American Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Canada ahead.

American Samoa ranks 40th and Canada ranks 37th of 179 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, American Samoa averaged higher in 2 and Canada in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade American Samoa Canada Difference Ahead
1990s 51.89 Production 56.68 Production 4.79 Production Canada
2000s 49.32 Production 48.29 Production 1.03 Production American Samoa
2010s 50.38 Production 50.11 Production 0.276 Production American Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc, American Samoa or Canada?
Canada, at 54.82 Production against 50.47 Production in American Samoa as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc between American Samoa and Canada?
4.35 Production, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Canada?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do American Samoa and Canada rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - luluc?
American Samoa ranks 40th and Canada ranks 37th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

American Samoa vs Canada: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/american-samoa/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-luluc-production/american-samoa/canada/">American Samoa vs Canada: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - LULUC (Production)
Unit
Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 4,654 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).