Rwanda vs Trinidad and Tobago: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption

Rwanda
1.61
in 2015
Trinidad and Tobago
1.71
in 2015
Rwanda rank
99th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
96th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption over time

  • Rwanda
  • Trinidad and Tobago
11.522.533.5199020022015

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 1.71 against 1.61 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.1.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Rwanda ranks 99th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 96th of 195 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 2.09 1.95 0.1401 Rwanda
2000s 1.77 1.92 0.147 Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 1.81 1.69 0.1116 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - consumption, Rwanda or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 1.71 against 1.61 in Rwanda as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - consumption between Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.1, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - consumption?
Rwanda ranks 99th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 96th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Trinidad and Tobago: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-consumption/rwanda/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-consumption/rwanda/trinidad-and-tobago/">Rwanda vs Trinidad and Tobago: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
195 places, 5,054 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).