Dominican Republic vs Ukraine: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption

Dominican Republic
2.74
in 2015
Ukraine
2.63
in 2015
Dominican Republic rank
68th
Ukraine rank
70th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Ukraine
01234199020022015

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 2.74 against 2.63 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.11.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 68th and Ukraine ranks 70th of 195 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Ukraine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s 3.35 2.29 1.06 Dominican Republic
2000s 2.98 2.6 0.3842 Dominican Republic
2010s 2.55 3.32 0.7727 Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - consumption, Dominican Republic or Ukraine?
Dominican Republic, at 2.74 against 2.63 in Ukraine as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - consumption between Dominican Republic and Ukraine?
0.11, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Ukraine?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Dominican Republic and Ukraine rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - consumption?
Dominican Republic ranks 68th and Ukraine ranks 70th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Ukraine: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-consumption/dominican-republic/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-consumption/dominican-republic/ukraine/">Dominican Republic vs Ukraine: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Consumption
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
195 places, 5,054 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).