Kosovo vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Kosovo
82.79
in 2019
New Zealand
92.13
in 2019
Kosovo rank
1st
New Zealand rank
2nd

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Kosovo
  • New Zealand
020406080100200320112019

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 92.13 against 82.79 in Kosovo, a difference of 9.34.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Kosovo's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Kosovo ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 2nd of 1 groups.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kosovo New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 75.41 92.13 16.72 New Zealand
2010s 79.84 92.13 12.3 New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Kosovo or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 92.13 against 82.79 in Kosovo as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Kosovo and New Zealand?
9.34, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and New Zealand?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Kosovo and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Kosovo ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 2nd of 1 groups.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.