Djibouti vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Djibouti
52.87
in 2019
New Zealand
92.13
in 2019
Djibouti rank
1st
New Zealand rank
2nd

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Djibouti
  • New Zealand
020406080100200320112019

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 92.13 against 52.87 in Djibouti, a difference of 39.26.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.7 times Djibouti's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Djibouti ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 2nd of 1 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 52.87 92.13 39.26 New Zealand
2010s 52.87 92.13 39.26 New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Djibouti or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 92.13 against 52.87 in Djibouti as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Djibouti and New Zealand?
39.26, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and New Zealand?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Djibouti and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Djibouti ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 2nd of 1 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.