Sudan vs Palestine, State of: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Sudan
22.22
in 2019
Palestine, State of
22.22
in 2019
Sudan rank
177th
Palestine, State of rank
177th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Sudan
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 22.22 against 22.22 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 177th and Palestine, State of ranks 177th of 191 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Sudan or Palestine, State of?
- Sudan, at 22.22 against 22.22 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Sudan and Palestine, State of?
- 0, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Palestine, State of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Sudan and Palestine, State of rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Sudan ranks 177th and Palestine, State of ranks 177th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.