Saudi Arabia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Saudi Arabia
63.89
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
63.89
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
36th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
36th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 63.89 against 63.89 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Saudi Arabia ranks 36th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 36th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Saudi Arabia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saudi Arabia, at 63.89 against 63.89 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Saudi Arabia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 36th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 36th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.