Mozambique vs Papua New Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Mozambique
47.22
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
47.22
in 2019
Mozambique rank
82nd
Papua New Guinea rank
82nd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Mozambique
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 47.22 against 47.22 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 82nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Mozambique or Papua New Guinea?
- Mozambique, at 47.22 against 47.22 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Mozambique and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Papua New Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Mozambique and Papua New Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Mozambique ranks 82nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.