Mongolia vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Mongolia
30.56
in 2019
Samoa
30.56
in 2019
Mongolia rank
150th
Samoa rank
150th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Mongolia
- Samoa
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 30.56 against 30.56 in Samoa, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 150th and Samoa ranks 150th of 190 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Mongolia or Samoa?
- Mongolia, at 30.56 against 30.56 in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Mongolia and Samoa?
- 0, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Samoa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Samoa rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Mongolia ranks 150th and Samoa ranks 150th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.