Mauritius vs Serbia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)

Mauritius
75
in 2019
Serbia
75
in 2019
Mauritius rank
16th
Serbia rank
16th

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time

  • Mauritius
  • Serbia
020406080201520172019

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 75 against 75 in Serbia, a difference of 0.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 16th of 191 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Mauritius or Serbia?
Mauritius, at 75 against 75 in Serbia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Mauritius and Serbia?
0, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Serbia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Mauritius and Serbia rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Mauritius ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Serbia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19). Statizoid. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/mauritius/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/mauritius/serbia/">Mauritius vs Serbia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.