How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Namibia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)

Malta

58.33

in 2019

Namibia

58.33

in 2019

Malta rank

53rd

Namibia rank

53rd

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time

Malta
Namibia

How they compare

Malta currently reports 58.33 against 58.33 in Namibia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 53rd of 190 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Malta or Namibia?: Malta, at 58.33 against 58.33 in Namibia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Malta and Namibia?: 0, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?: Malta ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Namibia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19). Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/malta/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/malta/namibia/">Malta vs Namibia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.